Thursday, August 27, 2015

ISIS is the anti-Islam -Blogger Zeev Maghen, AUGUST 26, 2015,


Courtesy: Blogger Zeev Maghen
[Ze’ev Maghen is professor of Arabic Literature and Islamic History and Chairman of the Department of Middle East Studies at Bar-Ilan University.  He is a senior fellow at Shalem College in Jerusalem and at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. His most recent book is John Lennon and the Jews: A Philosophical Rampage (Toby Press, 2015).]

Once the Prophet Muhammad and his followers, on their way back from a bloody engagement with the Christian Byzantines (circa 628 CE), stopped at a Bedouin camp next to an oasis. When afternoon prayers were finished, the Prophet began to preach to his rapt listeners about the various types of hellfire awaiting sinners in the afterlife: 
nar, laẓa, saqar, ḥuṭama…


Meanwhile, a Bedouin woman with a baby tied to her hip crouched down nearby and baked bread for the visitors over the flames of her saj. At one point some grease fell into the fire and it surged. The mother leapt back to protect her infant, and then turned wrathfully on Muḥammad:

“Are you the one they call the Messenger of God?” she demanded.
“I am,” he replied.
“And you teach that He is our Progenitor, our Creator?” she queried.
“Indeed,” acknowledged Muhammad.
“And you claim that He is ‘the Merciful, the Beneficent’?” she pressed on.
“He is,” confirmed the Prophet.
“If so,” continued the woman, “then you are a liar! A loving parent would never throw His children into the fire.”
So saying, she stormed off — and Muḥammad wept.
***
There were two main reactions on the international scene to the ineffably horrific ISIS video recording the execution by fire of the captured Jordanian pilot Mu’adh al-Kasasbah. The first reaction was typical and expected: a flood of Western pundits who lie in wait for every opportunity to besmirch the Muslim religion had a field day. Here, they gloated, was the true face of Islam unmasked: medieval barbarity enshrined in immutable statutes carried out by sadistic torturers. This much, at least, may be adduced to bolster their argument: that while movements like the Muslim Brotherhood among the Sunnis or the Khomeinist revolutionaries in Shi’ite Iran have always been restrained by the considerable element of modernism with which their ideologies are interlarded, the caliphal doctrine of the “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria” suffers from no such eclecticism. The actions of ISIS — including the modes of execution they choose — are motivated by Islam and Islam alone.
Then ISIS follows Islamic law?
Well, no. There was a second and no less vociferous reaction to the burning video — among a relative few Middle East specialists in Western academe and, far more importantly, among the legions of Muslim clerics and intellectuals throughout the Islamic world who have been seeking desperately for a way to distance their creed from Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s headline-grabbing decapitators. Here was their chance.
Affected as he may have been by the censure of the Bedouin woman — or by any number of other factors and circumstances — Muhammad could not very well alter the myriad fire and brimstone revelations that he had received from Allah over the years and enshrined as the Qur’an. But he did see to it that incinerating human beings would remain a solely divine prerogative. La yu’adh-dhibu bi’l-nar illa rabb al-nar, he insisted on more than one occasion: “Only the Lord of Fire punishes by fire.”
“Ah hah!” the cry resounded across the warp and woof of the Islamic Internet in the wake of the Kasasbeh video, emanating even from the mouths of Muslim scholars at Cairo’s Al-Azhar Seminary and (on the other side of the Sunni-Shi’i divide) Qom’s Howze-ye Elmiyeh. “Not only is ISIS unrepresentative of the Muslim religion, it is in direct and flagrant violation of its precepts, indeed, appears to be abjectly ignorant of those same precepts. Otherwise how explain its boastful display before the entire world of an execution by incineration, when even a mildly knowledgeable Muslim knows that ‘Only the Lord of Fire punishes by fire’!?” (And here is the proper place to note, pace the Islam-baiting propagandists cited above who are almost invariably Christian or Jewish, that of the three monotheistic religions Islam is the only one that does notprescribe, and indeed explicitly proscribes, death by burning. Indeed, not a few Muslim sages, embarrassed by the actions of ISIS, saw fit to accuse — vu den? — the Jews of insinuating execution by fire into Islam via a disgraced Muslim literary genre known as the Isra’iliyyat). Here, at any rate, was the proof that the more traditional exponents of Islam had been seeking that ISIS was, as it were, in flagrante delicto.
Then…ISIS does not follow Islamic law?
Well, not so fast. These Muslim apologists jumped too soon. First of all, not every Muslim figure of the religion’s formative period felt bound by this prophetic prohibition or even accepted its authenticity. Abu Bakr, the first Caliph or Successor to Muhammad, commanded that a bonfire be built in the “Prophet’s Mosque” itself and the traitor Iyas bin Abd Ya’lil, who had joined the infidel forces against the Muslim believers in the “Wars of Apostasy,” be thrown into it. Ali, the fourth Caliph, did the same with a group of “extremists” who sought to deify him (they were called Ali Ilahis — “those who claim that Ali is God” — and their theological descendants, the Alawites, are currently fighting for their lives against ISIS in Syria). As these enthusiasts were consumed by the flames they purportedly cried out to the Caliph: “Now we know that you are God, since ‘Only the Lord of Fire punishes by fire!’”
But ISIS was not relying solely on such counter-precedents; their self-justification is more sophisticated than that. Indeed, the specialist who watches the Kasasbeh video from beginning to end (not just skipping to the “juicy” part) and with close attention to the many individual “vignettes” and how they all fit together, quickly realizes that not profound religious ignorance but — in point of fact — impressive Islamic erudition is on display here. Much of the first half of the video is devoted to depicting the horrific results of bombing from the air: men, women and children on fire — writhing and twisting and falling to the ground — or their seared corpses after the fact. Many a charred limb was shown thrusting up from a pile of rubble, many a bereaved mother was shown shrieking in unspeakable agony over little blackened bodies — instances and symbols of the indescribable devastation wreaked from afar by callous pilots who nonchalantly dropped their payloads.
A relatively obscure hadith — one of tens of thousands of “reports” concerning the statements and actions of the Prophet Muhammad that form the bedrock of Muslim religion even more so than the Qur’an — describes how on a particular occasion Muhammad crushed the head of a Jew with two large rocks. Why did he do this? Because the same Jew had murdered his servant girl by crushing her head with two large rocks. I call this hadith “obscure” because in the countless anthologies of such reports assembled after the ninth century CE it appears rather seldom. It was, on the other hand, picked up and put to comparatively heavy use by Muslim legal literature, where it provided support for the position that capital punishment via “measure for measure” — killing the killer in the manner that he killed — is masnun, that is, a praiseworthy and preferable method of execution. Similarly, Muhammad once plucked out the eyes of a band of men because they had gouged out the eyes of his shepherd — an eye for an eye.
This is the Islamic legal principle that the ISIS video was unquestionably designed to invoke: the propriety of execution via measure for measure. Kasasbeh the fighter pilot dropped bombs that caused the incineration of dozens if not hundreds of people — as “documented” by the footage shown in the first half of the film — therefore it is only right that he should be punished for this crime specifically through incineration. And this principle, as at least some Muslim fuqaha or medieval legal scholars argue, trumps the prohibition against execution by fire.
Moreover: in the most awful moments of the video, when the poor pilot was literally melting alive and his terrible screams were only partially drowned out by the crescendo of martial-music-meets-pious-liturgy that has become the ISIS execution soundtrack, another quote from the Islamic classical sources was plastered across the screen. Based on a different hadith — one in which Muhammad is declared to have been “favored over all the previous prophets…in that my enemies begin trembling a full month before my armies arrive” — this citation from a fourteenth century text permits the implementation of extraordinary measures (such as burning prisoners at the stake) for the purpose of striking fear into the hearts of the foe.
Finally, ISIS spokesmen delved deep into the recesses of hadithexegesis and legal responsa in order to adduce minority opinions to the effect that the prophetic utterance “Only the Lord of Fire punishes by fire” is not to be construed as a statement of law but rather as a statement of fact, the purpose of which is to encourage humility before the deity: see how great and terrible Allah is! In that case there is no prohibition at all. The monstrous manner in which Kasasbeh paid the ultimate penalty was, based upon such logic as well, shown to be a legitimate one by Muslim standards.
Nor, while we are on the subject, is this the only example of ISIS’ “learnedness” and loyalty to the shari’ah (Islamic law). Another video that made the rounds recently sought to demonstrate that the purportedly pious members of ISIS are in reality just as randy and shameless as the rest of us. It documented a squadron of fighters who had stumbled upon a pool in the back of an abandoned house in Northern Syria. It was a hot day and the perspiring warriors didn’t hesitate for a minute: they stripped down and headed for the diving board. But what the gleeful circulators of this video apparently missed was not only that most of the fighters kept enough clothing on to abide by the Islamic male modesty code — which requires that the area between navel and knees be covered — but that just before jumping, every half-naked jihadist made it his business to declaim the same hadith (which, by the way, has its origins in the Talmud): “The Messenger of Allah said: It is the duty of every father to teach his son how to swim…” One after another they cited their Prophet to this effect in loud, boisterous voices, and then took the plunge.
And then there was the poster put up in the beginning of July in several ISIS-held cities to celebrate the advent of Ramadhan. It announced a Qur’an memorization contest, detailing the chapters of the Holy Book to be learned by heart and listing the mosques where registration would take place (“the Osama bin Laden mosque, the Abu Musa al-Zarqawi mosque…”). The poster then enumerated the prizes. Those in fourth through tenth place would receive considerable sums of money, whereas the reward for placing first, second or third was… “a slave girl.”
ISIS, as we pointed out above, is sui generis among Islamist organizations of our time in resisting the temptation to make allowances for modernist influence: not even al-Qa’ida was willing to reinstitute the bondage that has ever remained on the Islamic books — to say nothing of Saudi Wahhabism, Hizbullah, Hamas, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood and the like (and this is probably the appropriate place to point out that Judaism, Christianity and pretty much every other major religion also has slavery on the books. Indeed, the Arabic word for “slave girl” used in the announcement, sabi, is the etymological sibling of the biblical Hebrew shevuya: the female prisoner of war who is pressed into servitude by her captors [see Deuteronomy 21: 14]). If Allah and Muhammad allowed the keeping of and trafficking in slaves — and their distribution as prizes — then that is what will happen in ISIS held territory. ISIS is about living the classical Muslim sources, and doing so unapologetically.
Then…ISIS does follow Islamic law?
Well, no. Not really. There is one thing that the above analysis left out, and it’s a big thing. Arguably Islam’s premier “claim to fame” — the characteristic that Muslim tradition flaunts proudly at every possible opportunity as its indelible hallmark — is that it is din al-yusr, “the religion of facility” and din al-rukhsa, “the religion of leniency.” “It is by God’s mercy that you dealt with the people gently,” Allah informs His Apostle in the Qur’an, “for had you been stern and fierce with them, they would surely have deserted you” (Q. 3: 158). “Religion is ease,” seconded Muhammad himself in a well known hadith, “and anyone who makes it rigorous will in the end be overcome by it.”
Confronted with manifestations of human frailty, the Muslim God is almost invariably shown “going soft.” Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqas, one of the Prophet’s Companions (the sahaba, those who followed Muhammad during his lifetime), had avenged the death of his brother in battle by killing an enemy polytheist and despoiling him of his sword. He met Muhammad afterward and exclaimed, “O Messenger of God! With this sword God has quenched my thirst for vengeance!” The Prophet, however, chided him: “That sword is neither mine nor thine — go and throw it in with the common booty!” Sa’d recounted:
“So I went and threw it in, and then I turned to go, my heart heavy with that which only God knows because of the murder of my brother and the confiscation of my plunder. I had not gone more than a few steps, however, when the [Qur’anic] ‘Chapter of Spoils’ was revealed [by Allah to Muhammad, in which allowances were made for situations like Sa’d’s], and the Prophet called out to me and said: ‘Go back and take your sword!”
On another occasion a follower of Muhammad’s named Harith son of Suwayd “defected to the Byzantines and converted to Christianity.” In response to this combination of treason and apostasy, Allah waxed wroth and, as it were, hurled down the following verses:
How shall God guide those who lapse into unbelief after embracing the Faith, and after acknowledging the Apostle and receiving veritable truths? God does not guide the evil-doers! Their reward shall be the curse of God, of the angels and of all men; under it they will abide forever. Their punishment shall not be lightened, neither shall they ever be granted a reprieve…(Q. 3: 89).
All possibility of pardon having been expressly denied, one would have expected Harith to remain in Constantinople. Instead he soon thereafter wrote to Muhammad, asking: Is there any repentance for me?” Immediately, “Allah abrogated those verses, and revealed [their mitigating, indeed counteractive, conclusion]: ‘…except for those who repent and mend their ways, for God is forgiving and merciful’” (Q. 3: 89).
If Allah is so malleable, then who is Muhammad to be strict? And the Prophet of Islam certainly engaged in imitatio dei in this regard. His inclination towards alleviation, eagerness to accommodate, readiness to retract and indomitable soft-spot form a central motif of Muslim classical literature. He shortened congregational services for the sake of a mother with a difficult child, instructed a young man who found it hard to rise early to “pray whenever you get up,” granted amnesty to an erstwhile amanuensis who had defected from Islam and declared him an imposter, and threatened to thrash a maidservant who returned late from an errand…with a toothpick. Elaborating on the many activities forbidden in Mecca’s Sacred Precinct, Muhammad reached the subject of flora: “There shall be no gathering of shrubs or grasses there, for such was forbidden by God himself on the day He created heaven and earth, and it will remain thus forbidden forever, from now until Resurrection Day!”
The Companion Abdullah Ibn Abbas interrupted: “O Messenger of God — except for the Idhkhir bush, yes? For it is used by the people to ornament their persons and their houses.”
“Except for the Idhkhir bush,” retreated Muhammad, without losing a beat.
Allah set the tone as archetypal and forgiving Mufti On High, handing down indulgences in response to, and in compassion for, the endemic weaknesses of human flesh — and Muhammad was His Prophet: clement, pliable, forbearing, moderate (not always, to be sure: Allah’s Apostle could not abide satire, for instance, which he regarded as blasphemy, and regularly had satirists assassinated — the “Charlie Hebdos” of their time. Nor could he, in general, abide Jews, and he persecuted and massacred them on more than one occasion. And there is, of course, jihad — though few nations or religions in history have not been characterized by the urge to conquest. When all is said and done, however, Muhammad was, contrary to popular belief, a true moderate in his time). And because the Prophet was and is seen by Islam as thequdwa hasana, the Excellent Exemplar, Muslim jurists throughout Islamic history have followed Muhammad and his God in consistently seeking the way of palliation and extenuation. They cultivated and eventually standardized notions such as istislah (easing of regulations based on considerations of public weal), istihsan (dismissal of difficult rules at the jurist’s discretion), umum al-balwa (leniency based on “ubiquity of hardship”), even hiyal (the science of constructing countless loopholes through which to escape the law). Few truths are more central and unique to Islam than the fact that almost unlimited flexibility is built into the Muslim legal system. The tendency toward leniency is part of the very DNA of fiqh (jurisprudence) and shari’a (positive law). Islamic law is not Islamic law unless it is constantly busy finding ways to mitigate itself.
The leaders of ISIS unquestionably know their texts. But they are literalists, fundamentalists, in their reading of those texts, taking the letter of the law at face value. Genuine Islam is anything but literalist or fundamentalist: it is interpretive, creative, tractable and compassionate (this is not some feel-good liberal or reformist Islamic line; as we have striven to show above, it is the most orthodox of Islamic outlooks). When ISIS hears a rumor about a homosexual, an adulterer, a Shi’ite, or even a magician who performs at children’s birthday parties living in a neighborhood they have recently taken over, there is no due process, let alone any creative exegesis or thought of mercy: they throw him off of a tall building, bury her up to her waist and stone her to death, drown him in a cage or lop off the “sorcerer’s” head with a scimitar. Then they make videos that mock the terror of the victims of their executions and inflict unspeakable agony on their loved ones, including the recent and unprecedentedly disgusting “Fifty Ways to Kill an Infidel” blockbuster. (This last may have been too much even for ISIS: according to certain reports the “caliph” al-Baghdadi recently instructed that his followers desist from videoing executions).
But when capital offenses were brought to the attention of the Prophet — so the hadith tells us repeatedly — he would close his ears and turn away and pretend he hadn’t heard. If his hand were nevertheless forced he would do everything in his power — employing highly creative and even rather questionable legal means — to get the offender off lightly. And if in the end Muhammad had no choice but to implement the ultimatehadd punishment, he strictly enjoined that it be carried out with the utmost sensitivity and respect, both for the one executed and for his or her family. What a world of difference between the approach of the Prophet and that of ISIS! What a yawning chasm between the outlook and methodology of Islamic law and that of the new, self-styled, Iraqo-Syrian “Caliphate”!
Then…ISIS does not follow Islamic Law?
No. Not by a long shot. ISIS flagrantly violates Islamic law every day. Its executions are murders, plain and simple, and its policies undermine everything that the Muslim religion has always stood for. ISIS spits savagely on the tradition of the jurists, the precedents of the caliphs, and the eternal example of the Prophet Muhammad himself.

ISIS is the anti-Islam.

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Western intellectual culture, rather culture followed by the politicians is “All for us and nothing for other people”, which is the outcome of their “Masters of Mankind” tendency.

Western intellectual culture, rather culture followed by the politicians is “All for us and nothing for other people”, which is the outcome of their “Masters of Mankind” tendency.
Quoted from:
Anticipatory self-defense and pendulum of world order
-By Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury


Anticipatory self-defense and pendulum of world order 
-By Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
Has the global population as yet been able responding to the decade-old calls of Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein of setting aside the strong feelings they hold on many issues and consider themselves as members of biological species? Are we, the members of the unique biological species called ‘human’ are more actively moving towards the directions, where on every day, we sense the threat of bloodshed in the name of self-defense or even war thus pushing the very fate of this beautiful planet into mere destruction ? While the majority of the human population is vehemently against war, have we been able seeing the hegemonic power in the world, rather renouncing war? Eminent writer Noam Chomsky rightly said, “By now, the world’s hegemonic power accords itself the right to wage war at will, under a doctrine of anticipatory self-defense, with unstated bounds. International laws, treaties and rules of world order are sternly imposed on others with much self-righteous posturing, but dismissed as irrelevant for the United States – a long-standing practice, driven to new depths by Reagan and Bush II administration.”
Here, what I would like to say is, the attitude or political tendencies of Clinton or today’s Obama is no exception, if not even worst, where playing double-standard has become a regular phenomenon for the major players of today’s global politics. Would it not be more appropriate and appreciable if the holders of the status called super-power would apply themselves the same standards they do to others, if not more stringent one? Western intellectual culture, rather culture followed by the politicians is “All for us and nothing for other people”, which is the outcome of their “Masters of Mankind” tendency. When they deal with the leading topic of today’s world – terror, their notion is rather straight-forward, where terror against them is the ultimate evil and their hegemony or terror is entirely appropriate. Take into consideration the Washington’s war against Nicaragua in 1980, where “soft-targets” on civilians were allowed to be attacked and murdered during military offensives, for, what Washington interpreted as “pouring democracy at the end”, at the cost of ocean of civilian blood. Democracy itself has different interpretation in the codes of US elites. To them, burning the Islamic Holy book Quran by Pastor Terry Jones is treated as part of freedom of expression or democracy, while doing the same with Bible would be blasphemous. Many analysts believe that, politicians in US are suffering from bankruptcy of moral clarity or idealism. In the case of Quran burning by Terry Jones and his pall, if the US administration would have moved quickly in stopping him from burning the Holy Scripture, the subsequent unrest in the Muslim world and death of people could be easily avoided.
In March 2002, President George W Bush declared the creation of ‘Millennium Challenge Corporation’ with the objective of boosting funding to combat poverty in the developing world. The project had promised US$ 10 billion budget, when the MCC was created. But just in three years, in 2005, the administration of President Bush greatly reduced the budget, causing in resignation of the head of MCC, as it failed to get any of the projects moving. It happened, not only because of heavy slice on the promised budget, but visibly the government not disbursing almost anything into the fund of Millennium Challenge Corporation. The Bush administration even rejected the call from British Prime Minister Tony Blair to double aid to Africa and expressed willingness to join other industrial countries in cutting unplayable African debts only if aid was correspondingly reduced, moves that amount to a death sentence for more than six million Africans a year who die of preventable and treatable causes.
In 2005, administration of President George W Bush suffered from severe dilemma on the issue of extraditing the most dangerous Latin American terrorist named Luis Posada Carriles to Venezuela to face charges of bombing a Cuban airline killing seventy-three people. The charges brought against Luis Posada were substantiated with specific evidences. But there was a ‘major issue’ for Bush administration, which stopped them in accepting the Venezuelan call for extraditing Posada. The fact is, after Posada escaped Venezuelan prison, he was reportedly hired by covert operatives of United States to direct the resupply operation for the Nicaraguan contras from El Salvador. While refusing to extradite Luis Posada, the US Senate and Congress passed a bill barring US aid to any nation, which would refuse any requests of extradition from Washington. In this case, the US Senate and Congress upheld the doctrine saying “those who harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves”.
What we see in today’s United States, is a state patronized propaganda war or spread of hatred against Muslims and Islam as a whole. With the fact that US have a large number of Muslim populations, it would be really unjust and unkind to label every Muslim as jihadists while the Islam as a rogue religion. On the other hand, no one utters a word about terrorism by Christian extremists in many countries in the world. It should be mentioned here that, the very recent bomb blast at Oslo [for the first time in their history] was by a fanatic Christian. There are also Christian terrorism in Europe and America. In a 2005 Congressional hearing about radicalization in US prisons, Sheila Jackson Lee stated that investigators needed to analyze Christian militants in America because they might try to "bring down the country”.
Christian terrorism comprises terrorist acts by groups or individuals who claim the Christian motivations or goals for their actions. As with other forms of religious terrorism, Christian terrorists have relied on idiosyncratic or literal interpretations of the tenets of faith – in this case, the Bible. Such groups have used Old Testament and New Testament scriptures to justify violence and killing or to seek to bring about the "end times" described in the New Testament, while others have hoped to bring about a Christian theocracy. Beginning after the Civil War, members of the Protestant-led, Ku Klux Klan organization began engaging in arson, beatings, cross burning, destruction of property, lynching, murder, rape, tar-and-feathering, and whipping against African Americans, Jews, Catholics, and other social or ethnic minorities.
They were explicitly Christian terrorist in ideology, basing their beliefs on a "religious foundation" in Christianity. The goals of the KKK included, from an early time on, intent to, "reestablish Protestant Christian values in America by any means possible," and believe that "Jesus was the first Klansman." Their cross-burnings were conducted not only to intimidate targets, but to demonstrate their respect and reverence for Jesus Christ, and the lighting ritual was steeped in Christian symbolism, including the saying of prayers and singing of Christian hymns. Many modern Klan organizations, such as the Knights Party, USA, continue to focus on the Christian supremacist message, asserting that there is a "war" on to destroy "western Christian civilization."
During the twentieth century, members of extremist groups such as the Army of God began executing attacks against abortion clinics and doctors across the United States. A number of terrorist attacks were attributed to individuals and groups with ties to the Christian Identity and Christian Patriot movements, including the Lambs of Christ. Groups called Concerned Christians were deported from Israel on suspicion of planning to attack holy sites in Jerusalem at the end of 1999, believing that their deaths would "lead them to heaven." The motive for anti-abortionist Scott Roeder murdering Wichita doctor George Tiller on May 31, 2009 was a belief that abortion is criminal and immoral, and that this belief went "hand in hand" with his religious beliefs. The Centennial Olympic Park bombing in 1996, as well as subsequent attacks on an abortion clinic and a lesbian nightclub, were made by Eric Robert Rudolph; Michael Barkun, a professor at Syracuse University, considers Rudolph to likely fit the definition of a Christian terrorist, whereas James A. Aho, a professor at Idaho State University, argues instead that Rudolph was inspired only in part by religious considerations.
Hutaree was a Christian militia group based in Adrian, Michigan. In 2010, after an FBI agent infiltrated the group, nine of its members were indicted by a federal grand jury in Detroit on charges of seditious conspiracy to use of improvised explosive devices, teaching the use of explosive materials, and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence. Terrorism scholar Aref M. Al-Khattar has listed The Covenant, The Sword, and the Arm of the Lord, Defensive Action, The Freemen Community, and what Al-Khattar called "the Christian militia that supported Timothy McVeigh", as groups that "can be placed under the category of far-right-wing terrorism" that "has a religious [Christian] component".
There are currently a number of Islam hating groups and individuals in US, who are funding a project called “Killing a Muslim through a fellow Muslim”. Concept of this project is to provide finance to a Muslim, who would agree to kill a fellow Muslim. Such plans also include bombing mosques and Muslim dominated residential areas. No doubt, such ventures would sound extremely “glamorous” and “attractive” to a section of people in US, but, if someone will deeply scrutinize the ultimate motive of these people, will come to realize that, their sole intention is to destabilize the social harmony in United States as well turn America as the number one enemy of the Muslim world. Importantly enough, major segment of the Christian population in US as well as the entire Jewish community are always combating any such heinous activities such as “Killing a Muslim through a fellow Muslim”. It is only operated by a hand-picked number of so-called Christians, who also are Catholics. Dubious foreign funds are flowing into their hands for implementation of such plans. Those funders of these projects are using these “agents inside US” in continuing subversive activities, which would ultimately go against the interest of America.
Despite the fact of US administration’s double standard or their policy of anticipatory self-defense, it should be taken into consideration that the civilians in United States are not that much affected by any such fear. In fact, they too are victim of questioned policy of the politicians. Most importantly, it is high time for Washington to re-assess their policies, when their own economy is in trouble. They have no options left but to accept a plain fact that, economic strength is gradually slipping out of their grips. China, Japan, South Korea and India are already turning into the dominant players in today’s world economy. On the other hand, a number of Asian nations are no less influential militarily and in nuclear technology. The uni-polar world order is once again switching to bi-polar, if not multi-polar axis.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Dhaka Seminar 2006 Photo

L to R : K.A.Huq, Sanjeeb Chowdhury, Dutch Dilplomat, Prof.Anisuzzaman, Prof.Imtiaz Ahmad

L to R : Priobroto Brahmachary, Comrade Mehdi, Barrister Moudud Ahmed, Prof.Imtiaz Ahmad, Ataus Samad

L to R : Sanjeeb Chowdhury, Priobrata Brahmachary, Comrade Mehdi, Barrister Moudud Ahmed, Prof.Imtiaz Ahmad

L to R : Rakhaine Representative, K.A.Huq, Chitta Francis Ribeiro, Sanjeeb Chowdhury, Prof.Anisuzzaman, Brother Jarlath de Souza

L to R : Advocate Muniruzzaman, Sanjeeb Chowdhury, Chitta Francis Ribeiro

Part of  audience

Part of audience

Rakhaine Representive speaking

Rohingya Representative speaking

Russian Diplomat (First Secretary)

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

POPE FRANCIS : WAR IS ALWAYS A DEFEAT FOR HUMANITY



Vatican City, 7 September 2013 (VIS) – More than a hundred thousand people gathered in St- Peter's Square this evening in response to Pope Francis' appeal during last Sunday's Angelus in which he convoked for today, 7 September, a day of fasting and prayer for peace, in the light of the dramatic circumstances which have engulfed Syria. Since then, this initiative has been welcomed and applauded not only by Catholics and other Christian confessions, but also by those belonging to other religions, from Buddhists to Jews and Muslims, and even those who do not belong to any religion. This week has seen extensive mobilisation on the part of parishes and associations, Caritas and the Community of St. Egidio, prayer groups and religious orders such as the Descalced Carmelites of the Holy Land, mayors and presidents of autonomous regions, organisations for peace, co-operation and development, unions, and so on. Many prominent figures have joined in with the initiative, such as the architect Renzo Piano, the president of the European Parliament Martin Schulz and the Grand Mufti of Syria, spiritual leader of the Sunnis, who invoked peace this afternoon in the Ummayad Mosque, Damascus, with the nation's religious leaders. A prayer for peace was raised this afternoon in Catholic churches around the world, from Australia to Egypt.

The Square was crowded with people since the morning; among them there were many who wished to confess, from 5.45 onwards, to one of the fifty priests in the Constantine Wing and below the colonnade; Francis wanted confessors to be present on this day as “true peace is born of the human heart reconciled with God and with one's brothers”. At 18.30, the words uttered by the Pope last Sunday were repeated as an introduction to the Vigil which began at 7 p.m. with a greeting from the Pope and the singing of the “Veni Creator”, followed by the enthroning of the image of the Virgin as “Salus Populi Romani”, carried by four Swiss Guards.
The Pope began by praying the Rosary; each mystery was accompanied by the reading of a poem by St. Therese of Lisieux about the child Jesus, and at the end he invoked Maria: “Queen of Peace, pray for us”. He then pronounced the following homily:

“'And God saw that it was good'. The biblical account of the beginning of the history of the world and of humanity speaks to us of a God who looks at creation, in a sense contemplating it, and declares: 'it is good'. This, dear brothers and sisters, allows us to enter into God’s heart and, precisely from within him, to receive his message. We can ask ourselves: what does this message mean? What does it say to me, to you, to all of us?

“It says to us simply that this, our world, in the heart and mind of God, is the 'house of harmony and peace', and that it is the space in which everyone is able to find their proper place and feel 'at home', because it is 'good'. All of creation forms a harmonious and good unity, but above all humanity, made in the image and likeness of God, is one family, in which relationships are marked by a true fraternity not only in words: the other person is a brother or sister to love, and our relationship with God, who is love, fidelity and goodness, mirrors every human relationship and brings harmony to the whole of creation. God’s world is a world where everyone feels responsible for the other, for the good of the other. This evening, in reflection, fasting and prayer, each of us deep down should ask ourselves: Is this really the world that I desire? Is this really the world that we all carry in our hearts? Is the world that we want really a world of harmony and peace, in ourselves, in our relations with others, in families, in cities, in and between nations? And does not true freedom mean choosing ways in this world that lead to the good of all and are guided by love?

“But then we wonder: Is this the world in which we are living? Creation retains its beauty which fills us with awe and it remains a good work. But there is also 'violence, division, disagreement, war'. This occurs when man, the summit of creation, stops contemplating beauty and goodness, and withdraws into his own selfishness.

“When man thinks only of himself, of his own interests and places himself in the centre, when he permits himself to be captivated by the idols of dominion and power, when he puts himself in God’s place, then all relationships are broken and everything is ruined; then the door opens to violence, indifference, and conflict. This is precisely what the passage in the Book of Genesis seeks to teach us in the story of the Fall: man enters into conflict with himself, he realizes that he is naked and he hides himself because he is afraid, he is afraid of God’s glance; he accuses the woman, she who is flesh of his flesh; he breaks harmony with creation, he begins to raise his hand against his brother to kill him. Can we say that from harmony he passes to 'disharmony'? Can we say this: that from harmony he passes to 'disharmony'? No, there is no such thing as 'disharmony'; there is either harmony or we fall into chaos, where there is violence, argument, conflict, fear.

“It is exactly in this chaos that God asks man’s conscience: “Where is Abel your brother?” and Cain responds: 'I do not know; am I my brother’s keeper?'. We too are asked this question, it would be good for us to ask ourselves as well: Am I really my brother’s keeper? Yes, you are your brother’s keeper! To be human means to care for one another! But when harmony is broken, a metamorphosis occurs: the brother who is to be cared for and loved becomes an adversary to fight, to kill. What violence occurs at that moment, how many conflicts, how many wars have marked our history! We need only look at the suffering of so many brothers and sisters. This is not a question of coincidence, but the truth: we bring about the rebirth of Cain in every act of violence and in every war. All of us! And even today we continue this history of conflict between brothers, even today we raise our hands against our brother. Even today, we let ourselves be guided by idols, by selfishness, by our own interests, and this attitude persists. We have perfected our weapons, our conscience has fallen asleep, and we have sharpened our ideas to justify ourselves. As if it were normal, we continue to sow destruction, pain, death! Violence and war lead only to death, they speak of death! Violence and war are the language of death!

“After the chaos of the Flood, when it stopped raining, a rainbow appeared and the dove returned with an olive branch. I think also of the olive tree which representatives of various religions planted in Plaza de Mayo, in Buenos Aires, in 2000, asking that there be no more chaos, asking that there be no more war, asking for peace.

“And at this point I ask myself: Is it possible to walk the path of pace? Can we get out of this spiral of sorrow and death? Can we learn once again to walk and live in the ways of peace? Invoking the help of God, under the maternal gaze of the Salus Populi Romani, Queen of Peace, I say: Yes, it is possible for everyone! From every corner of the world tonight, I would like to hear us cry out: Yes, it is possible for everyone! Or even better, I would like for each one of us, from the least to the greatest, including those called to govern nations, to respond: Yes, we want it! My Christian faith urges me to look to the Cross. How I wish that all men and women of good will would look to the Cross if only for a moment! There, we can see God’s reply: violence is not answered with violence, death is not answered with the language of death. In the silence of the Cross, the uproar of weapons ceases and the language of reconciliation, forgiveness, dialogue, and peace is spoken. This evening, I ask the Lord that we Christians, and our brothers and sisters of other religions, and every man and woman of good will, cry out forcefully: violence and war are never the way to peace! Let everyone be moved to look into the depths of his or her conscience and listen to that word which says: Leave behind the self-interest that hardens your heart, overcome the indifference that makes your heart insensitive towards others, conquer your deadly reasoning, and open yourself to dialogue and reconciliation. Look upon your brother’s sorrow – I think of the children, look upon these - look upon your brother's sorrow, and do not add to it, stay your hand, rebuild the harmony that has been shattered; and all this not by conflict but by encounter! May the noise of weapons cease! War always marks the failure of peace, it is always a defeat for humanity. Let the words of Pope Paul VI resound again: 'No more one against the other, no more, never! ... war never again, never again war!'. 'Peace expresses itself only in peace, a peace which is not separate from the demands of justice but which is fostered by personal sacrifice, clemency, mercy and love'. Forgiveness, dialogue, reconciliation – these are the words of peace, in beloved Syria, in the Middle East, in all the world! Let us pray for reconciliation and peace, let us work for reconciliation and peace, and let us all become, in every place, men and women of reconciliation and peace! Amen”.

Following the Pope's words, a moment of silence was observed during the preparation of the altar for the exposition of the Holy Sacrament. The adoration was accompanied by a biblical reading on the theme of peace, followed by the Pope's prayer on this subject and a responsorial invocation as a plea for peace. At the end of each of those moments, five pairs of people, representing Syria, Egypt, the Holy Land, the United States and Russia, placed incense in the censer to the right of the altar. This offering was accompanied by a series of invocations on the common theme of peace, including: “Lord of life, bring to us your peace, to where the fate of nations is decided” and “Stop, with your creative power, all violence against human life”.

The adoration was followed by the reading - “in the longest form planned for the celebration of a vigil” - of the Gospel of St. John. Then, from around 10.15 to 10.40 p.m., there was a long period of silence for personal prayer.

At the conclusion of the ceremony, Pope Francis imparted his Eucharistic blessing to those present. Today, the Pope wrote to his nine million followers on Twitter, “Pray for peace”.

Friday, September 6, 2013

Anticipatory self-defense and pendulum of world order -By Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury



Has the global population as yet been able responding to the decade-old calls of Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein of setting aside the strong feelings they hold on many issues and consider themselves as members of biological species? Are we, the members of the unique biological species called ‘human’ are more actively moving towards the directions, where on every day, we sense the threat of bloodshed in the name of self-defense or even war thus pushing the very fate of this beautiful planet into mere destructions? While the majority of the human population is vehemently against war, have we been able seeing the hegemonic power in the world, rather renouncing war? Eminent writer Noam Chomsky rightly said, “By now, the world’s hegemonic power accords itself the right to wage war at will, under a doctrine of anticipatory self-defense, with unstated bounds. International laws, treaties and rules of world order are sternly imposed on others with much self-righteous posturing, but dismissed as irrelevant for the United States – a long-standing practice, driven to new depths by Reagan and Bush II administration.”


Here, what I would like to say is, the attitude or political tendencies of Clinton or today’s Obama is no exception, if not even worst, where playing double-standard has become a regular phenomenon for the major players of today’s global politics. Would it not be more appropriate and appreciable if the holders of the status called super-power would apply themselves the same standards they do to others, if not more stringent one? Western intellectual culture, rather culture followed by the politicians is “All for us and nothing for other people”, which is the outcome of their “Masters of Mankind” tendency. When they deal with the leading topic of today’s world – terror, their notion is rather straight-forward, where terror against them is the ultimate evil and their hegemony or terror is entirely appropriate. Take into consideration the Washington’s war against Nicaragua in 1980, where “soft-targets” on civilians were allowed to be attacked and murdered during military offensives, for, what Washington interpreted as “pouring democracy at the end”, at the cost of ocean of civilian blood. Democracy itself has different interpretation in the codes of US elites. To them, burning the Islamic Holy book Quran by Pastor Terry Jones is treated as part of freedom of expression or democracy, while doing the same with Bible would be blasphemous. Many analysts believe that, politicians in US are suffering from bankruptcy of moral clarity or idealism. In the case of Quran burning by Terry Jones and his pall, if the US administration would have moved quickly in stopping him from burning the Holy Scripture, the subsequent unrest in the Muslim world and death of people could be easily avoided.


In March 2002, President George W Bush declared the creation of ‘Millennium Challenge Corporation’ with the objective of boosting funding to combat poverty in the developing world. The project had promised US$ 10 billion budget, when the MCC was created. But just in three years, in 2005, the administration of President Bush greatly reduced the budget, causing in resignation of the head of MCC, as it failed to get any of the projects moving. It happened, not only because of heavy slice on the promised budget, but visibly the government not disbursing almost anything into the fund of Millennium Challenge Corporation. The Bush administration even rejected the call from British Prime Minister Tony Blair to double aid to Africa and expressed willingness to join other industrial countries in cutting unplayable African debts only if aid was correspondingly reduced, moves that amount to a death sentence for more than six million Africans a year who die of preventable and treatable causes.


In 2005, administration of President George W Bush suffered from severe dilemma on the issue of extraditing the most dangerous Latin American terrorist named Luis Posada Carriles to Venezuela to face charges of bombing a Cuban airline killing seventy-three people. The charges brought against Luis Posada were substantiated with specific evidences. But there was a ‘major issue’ for Bush administration, which stopped them in accepting the Venezuelan call for extraditing Posada. The fact is, after Posada escaped Venezuelan prison, he was reportedly hired by covert operatives of United States to direct the resupply operation for the Nicaraguan contras from El Salvador. While refusing to extradite Luis Posada, the US Senate and Congress passed a bill barring US aid to any nation, which would refuse any requests of extradition from Washington. In this case, the US Senate and Congress upheld the doctrine saying “those who harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves”.


What we see in today’s United States, is a state patronized propaganda war or spread of hatred against Muslims and Islam as a whole. With the fact that US have a large number of Muslim populations, it would be really unjust and unkind to label every Muslim as jihadists while the Islam as a rogue religion. On the other hand, no one utters a word about terrorism by Christian extremists in many countries in the world. It should be mentioned here that, the very recent bomb blast at Oslo [for the first time in their history] was by a fanatic Christian. There are also Christian terrorism in Europe and America. In a 2005 Congressional hearing about radicalization in US prisons, Sheila Jackson Lee stated that investigators needed to analyze Christian militants in America because they might try to "bring down the country”.


Christian terrorism comprises terrorist acts by groups or individuals who claim the Christian motivations or goals for their actions. As with other forms of religious terrorism, Christian terrorists have relied on idiosyncratic or literal interpretations of the tenets of faith – in this case, the Bible. Such groups have used Old Testament and New Testament scriptures to justify violence and killing or to seek to bring about the "end times" described in the New Testament, while others have hoped to bring about a Christian theocracy. Beginning after the Civil War, members of the Protestant-led, Ku Klux Klan organization began engaging in arson, beatings, cross burning, destruction of property, lynching, murder, rape, tar-and-feathering, and whipping against African Americans, Jews, Catholics, and other social or ethnic minorities.


They were explicitly Christian terrorist in ideology, basing their beliefs on a "religious foundation" in Christianity. The goals of the KKK included, from an early time on, intent to, "reestablish Protestant Christian values in America by any means possible," and believe that "Jesus was the first Klansman." Their cross-burnings were conducted not only to intimidate targets, but to demonstrate their respect and reverence for Jesus Christ, and the lighting ritual was steeped in Christian symbolism, including the saying of prayers and singing of Christian hymns. Many modern Klan organizations, such as the Knights Party, USA, continue to focus on the Christian supremacist message, asserting that there is a "war" on to destroy "western Christian civilization."


During the twentieth century, members of extremist groups such as the Army of God began executing attacks against abortion clinics and doctors across the United States. A number of terrorist attacks were attributed to individuals and groups with ties to the Christian Identity and Christian Patriot movements, including the Lambs of Christ. Groups called Concerned Christians were deported from Israel on suspicion of planning to attack holy sites in Jerusalem at the end of 1999, believing that their deaths would "lead them to heaven." The motive for anti-abortionist Scott Roeder murdering Wichita doctor George Tiller on May 31, 2009 was a belief that abortion is criminal and immoral, and that this belief went "hand in hand" with his religious beliefs. The Centennial Olympic Park bombing in 1996, as well as subsequent attacks on an abortion clinic and a lesbian nightclub, were made by Eric Robert Rudolph; Michael Barkun, a professor at Syracuse University, considers Rudolph to likely fit the definition of a Christian terrorist, whereas James A. Aho, a professor at Idaho State University, argues instead that Rudolph was inspired only in part by religious considerations.


Hutaree was a Christian militia group based in Adrian, Michigan. In 2010, after an FBI agent infiltrated the group, nine of its members were indicted by a federal grand jury in Detroit on charges of seditious conspiracy to use of improvised explosive devices, teaching the use of explosive materials, and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence. Terrorism scholar Aref M. Al-Khattar has listed The Covenant, The Sword, and the Arm of the Lord, Defensive Action, The Freemen Community, and what Al-Khattar called "the Christian militia that supported Timothy McVeigh", as groups that "can be placed under the category of far-right-wing terrorism" that "has a religious [Christian] component".


There are currently a number of Islam hating groups and individuals in US, who are funding a project called “Killing a Muslim through a fellow Muslim”. Concept of this project is to provide finance to a Muslim, who would agree to kill a fellow Muslim. Such plans also include bombing mosques and Muslim dominated residential areas. No doubt, such ventures would sound extremely “glamorous” and “attractive” to a section of people in US, but, if someone will deeply scrutinize the ultimate motive of these people, will come to realize that, their sole intention is to destabilize the social harmony in United States as well turn America as the number one enemy of the Muslim world. Importantly enough, major segment of the Christian population in US as well as the entire Jewish community are always combating any such heinous activities such as “Killing a Muslim through a fellow Muslim”. It is only operated by a hand-picked number of so-called Christians, who also are Catholics. Dubious foreign funds are flowing into their hands for implementation of such plans. Those funders of these projects are using these “agents inside US” in continuing subversive activities, which would ultimately go against the interest of America.


Despite the fact of US administration’s double standard or their policy of anticipatory self-defense, it should be taken into consideration that the civilians in United States are not that much affected by any such fear. In fact, they too are victim of questioned policy of the politicians. Most importantly, it is high time for Washington to re-assess their policies, when their own economy is in trouble. They have no options left but to accept a plain fact that, economic strength is gradually slipping out of their grips. China, Japan, South Korea and India are already turning into the dominant players in today’s world economy. On the other hand, a number of Asian nations are no less influential militarily and in nuclear technology. The uni-polar world order is once again switching to bi-polar, if not multi-polar axis.


Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury is the editor of Weekly Blitz